<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Useful tool or dirty pool- No confidence</title>
		<description>Comments for Useful tool or dirty pool- No confidence at http://www.apbweb.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.apbweb.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:23:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Poollice Chief Lincoln Rhoor irrelrevant info. ...</title>
			<link>http://www.apbweb.com/featured-articles/715-useful-tool-or-dirty-pool-no-confidence.html#comment-273</link>
			<description>Is a vote of no confidence a first amendment right to have What judicial recouse does a chief have to disprove accusations, many made up in many cases and the chief has no knowledge of the vote coming until he reads about it in the local papers.S
Suggestion How to resolve the issue           
Example have a judicial hearing officer by law listen to both sides allow the hearing officer throw out disproved accusations. 

Higher ranking officers in many situtaions with an agenda influence over the lower ranking officers telling them hey I going to be here for fifteen yesrs how are you going to vote,whem the national average for a chief in that position is three to five years .etc    much to think about its time for national chiefs association to steps up instead of leaving the chief under the bus

 . - Robert Kells</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:44:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

