<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Lay Offs</title>
		<description>Comments for Lay Offs at http://www.apbweb.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.apbweb.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:05:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>General Fund</title>
			<link>http://www.apbweb.com/pay-and-benefits-news-menu-24/486-lay-offs.html#comment-142</link>
			<description>  To the powers that be/or not to be!
   

  Reading this article makes my head spin. Sounds like the same old story we are facing in Virginia. I am stumped on why such a critical resource like law-enforcement is forced to pull from a general fund. Is this not an important enough of a service to the community that these states cant find ways to come up with a seperate Public Safety Fund????  Wake up folks! - steven kulick</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:23:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Deputy / Supervisor</title>
			<link>http://www.apbweb.com/pay-and-benefits-news-menu-24/486-lay-offs.html#comment-27</link>
			<description>I'll bet the general public feels real safe with fewer Michigan State Police on the roadway!  Law enforcement is always the first to be cut when an area feels the tightening belt of the economy.  Rest assured, the criminal will element knows and is just waiting for their opportunity to commit illegal acts in the community that has gotten rid of their protection.  It just does not make sence!    &gt;:( - T.W.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:25:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
